Skip to content

Get the most out of your people

Four disciplines around one thing: whether the strategy actually happens. It slips at whichever of them is weakest.

Most engagements touch two

The diagnosis comes before the proposal, which is why the thing you call about is often not the thing we end up fixing.

  1. Talent decisions

    Get the right people into the right seats.

    Strategy executes through people, so it matters enormously which ones and where. A wrong senior hire is the most expensive decision available to you and the slowest to undo. Assessment against a profile of the actual role, so the choice still holds up a year later.

    Executive assessment, success profiling, succession

  2. Performance enablement

    Make it possible for them to perform.

    The right person in the right seat still needs to know what good looks like, and to want it. Performance systems built with the managers who have to run them, and coaching for the people whose next step is the one that matters most.

    Performance management, goals and feedback, coaching

  3. Team effectiveness

    Fix the boundaries the work crosses.

    Almost no performance is truly individual any more. Strategy dies at the handoffs between functions that are each hitting their own targets, and no amount of individual excellence fixes a boundary nobody owns.

    Leadership team sessions, cross-functional work

  4. Culture and engagement

    Make the performance last.

    Everything above can be true for a quarter and gone by the next one. Culture decides whether performance is sustainable or whether you rebuild it every year, and it is measurable long before it shows up in your attrition numbers.

    Engagement measurement, culture design, survey analysis

All of it runs on measurement

The instrument is the easy part. The decision process around it is the work, which is why we run whatever fits the question and the stakes, including instruments you have already bought and trained people on.

High-stakes decisions

Selection, succession and executive assessment, where the cost of getting it wrong is measured in years.

HoganDRiVCPI 260Watson-GlaserRaven'sStructured interviewsSimulations

Insight and development

Lower-stakes instruments for coaching, self-awareness and team conversation, where the point is a better discussion rather than a decision.

EQ-i 2.0360 feedbackDISCTKI

Organization-level listening

Engagement and culture measurement, including instruments designed here and built to be read without a benchmark group.

DEEP30MISSIONCustom survey design

Three engagements from start to finish

What was actually measured, what changed, and where it stands now.

  • Capability that outlives the vendor

    Leadership Worth Following · September 14, 2026 · 1 min read

    • The DRiV needed practitioners who could deploy it well in rooms its author would never be in.
    • Licensing more users would not have achieved that, so the curriculum taught why the instrument behaves the way it does rather than how to read its output.
    • Every participant used the instrument on themselves before going anywhere near a client.
    • More than eighty are certified and none has called back for help with a debrief.

    The DRiV assessment needed practitioners who could deploy it well in rooms Chris would never be in. Licensing more users would not achieve that. The firm needed people who could handle whatever a real client brought them, including the situations no script covers.

    Designed the curriculum end to end, including the facilitation guides and the practice architecture. Built it to explain why the instrument behaves the way it does, rather than how to read its output, because a practitioner who understands the mechanism stops needing the script.

  • Twenty percent of goals were in the system

    McKesson · September 14, 2026 · 2 min read

    • Goal entry in the HRIS sat at twenty percent, so the system held no reliable record of what anyone was working toward.
    • The rebuild was end to end: what to add, what to remove, and the manager journey mapped with HRIS and Employee Experience.
    • Goal entry reached ninety-seven percent and calibration errors fell by three quarters.
    • Ninety-nine percent of teams said the conversation was worth having, which matters more than the ninety-eight percent who completed it.

    Performance management across the enterprise needed a redesign. Goal entry in the HRIS sat at twenty percent, which meant the system held no reliable record of what anyone was working toward. Every stakeholder group had a different view of what should change, particularly around calibration, performance labels, and how managers entered notes.

  • The top team, then the ones around it

    Kalsec · September 14, 2026 · 1 min read

    • Eight accomplished European leaders, where the problem was not capability but how they worked with each other.
    • A driver assessment ran before the session and was read three ways: each person alone, each pair, and the team as a whole.
    • Commitments were written before lunch and then tested the same afternoon against the team's own contentious issues.
    • The same design then ran for Sales, R&D, HR and Asia with no rebuild between rooms.

    A European leadership team of eight needed alignment on priorities, and the silos that had built up inside Europe and across the wider company needed breaking down. The team was accomplished and the problem was not capability, it was how they worked with each other.

    Ran a driver assessment across all eight leaders before the session, and read the results three ways: each person alone, each pair, and the team as a whole.

Not sure which one

Describe the problem in your own words and we will tell you which of the four it is, including when the answer is none of them.